Ḥeshbon Research · The Aliyah Ledger · No. 08

Is Israel expensive because of geography, or because of policy?

Israel sits at the top of almost every cost of living table, and the usual explanation is that it is small, isolated and surrounded by closed borders. There is one Israeli market where none of that held. In 2012 the government opened cellular service to competition, and the price of talking to people fell and kept falling. Everything else stayed the same country. This essay is about the difference between the two.

Communications prices, Israel and the United States, since July 2011
Two bars, each showing how far a country's communications price index moved between July 2011 and its latest reading. Both bars point left, because prices fell in both countries. The longer bar is the bigger fall.
Consumer price index for communication, COICOP 1999, index 2015 equals 100. Israel to March 2025, the United States to December 2024. Source: OECD via FRED, series ISRCP080000IXOBM and USACP080000IXOBM.
Scroll for the controlled experiment
The short version

One market was opened. It is the one market where Israel is cheap.

Israeli communications prices have fallen 45 percent since 2011 while everything else Israelis buy rose 20 percent. Communications is also the only category in the OECD price tables where Israel sits below the international average, in every year measured.

Geography did not change in 2012. Israel was the same size, in the same neighbourhood, with the same closed land borders, before and after. What changed was that the Ministry of Communications cut the fees operators charged each other, abolished exit penalties, forced the networks to lease capacity to virtual operators, and licensed two new carriers. Prices collapsed within months and have gone down every year since.

Food and cars got no such treatment, and they are where Israel is dearest. Israeli meat runs 64 percent above the OECD average and dairy 54 percent above. When Israel finally harmonised its import standards with Europe in January 2025, motor vehicles were excluded from the reform by name.

For a family pricing aliyah, that changes what the other numbers in this series mean. A cost that comes from geography is a constraint. A cost that comes from a licensing rule is a bet on whether the rule survives.

45%
Fall in Israeli communications prices, July 2011 to March 2025
7%
Fall in American communications prices over the same years, same measure
1 of 26
Categories where Israel sits below the OECD average. It is communications
Same country, same decade, same borders. One market was opened and one was not, and the prices did exactly what you would expect.
One

What happened when Israel opened a single market to competition?

Prices fell for fourteen years and never turned back

The chart below plots three price indexes, each one showing how prices moved against their own 2015 level. The blue line is what Israelis pay for communications. The amber line is what Americans pay for communications, built by the same statistical office to the same definition. The grey line is everything else in the Israeli shopping basket, all goods and services together.

The vertical rule marks 14 May 2012, the day Golan Telecom and HOT Mobile began selling. Watch the blue line at that rule, and then follow it all the way to the right edge.

Communications prices in Israel and the United States, 2010 to 2025
Consumer price index, 2015 equals 100. A falling line means prices going down.
Israel, communications United States, communications Israel, all items

Swipe the chart sideways to follow the lines to 2025.

Find the blue line at the rule, at 126.9 in May 2012. Seven months later it reads 118.1, a fall of 6.9 percent, and by December 2013 it reads 110.7. Now run your eye to the far right, where it ends at 70.3. The amber American line barely moves across the whole picture, from 100.9 to 93.9. The grey line, everything else Israelis buy, climbs the other way, from 97.1 to 116.4.

Nominal shekels understate it. Israeli communications fell 45 percent while the Israeli basket around it rose 20 percent, so measured against everything else a household buys, talking to people got 54 percent cheaper in fourteen years.

The pattern also rules out the easy objection that this was a price war that burned out. A price war produces a dip and a recovery. Every January reading in this series is lower than the January before it, without a single exception, from 2012 through 2025. Israelis now pay somewhere around 20 to 26 shekels a month for a line worth having, roughly six to eight dollars, against 150 to 250 shekels before the reform.

Two

What did the government actually do?

Six decisions, none of them about geography

Nothing in the table below moved a border or shortened a shipping lane. Each row is one regulatory decision, with the year it took effect and the thing it made possible. Read the middle column as the obstacle that was removed.

How the Israeli cellular market was opened
The Ministry of Communications under Moshe Kahlon, appointed 2009.
YearDecisionWhat it removed
2007Number portabilityLosing your phone number if you switched carrier
2010Mobile termination rates cut by the regulatorThe fee incumbents charged each other, which favoured the biggest network
2011Exit penalties abolished, handset payments separated from serviceThe contract lock that made leaving expensive
2011Mandatory network leasing to virtual operatorsThe need to build a network in order to sell service
2011New licences, with coverage and market share obligationsThe three firm market
2012Golan Telecom and HOT Mobile begin selling, 14 MayGolan opened at 99 shekels a month for unlimited service
The highlighted row is the one the chart above reacts to, though the four rows before it are what made that row possible. Golan reached 80,000 subscribers by July 2012 and 750,000 by May 2015.
The cost side

Somebody paid for this

The incumbents' share prices fell hard through 2012, and consolidation followed. Cellcom tried to buy Golan in 2015 and was blocked, Electra bought it in 2017 for 350 million shekels, and it merged into Cellcom in 2020. The two new carriers took a combined 20 percent of the market at their peak, and the industry has been shrinking back toward three players ever since.

The one thing that did not happen is the outcome the incumbents predicted. Israeli mobile operators were investing about 13 percent of revenue in network expansion by 2014, at or above the Canadian rate, so the argument that competition starves the network does not obviously hold in this case.

Three

So where is Israel expensive, and by how much?

Meat at 64 percent above, phones at 10 percent below

The next chart puts every consumption category on one ladder. The vertical line down the middle is the OECD average, set to 100. A category sitting to the right of that line costs more in Israel than the international average. A category to the left costs less. Each row carries three dots, one for each year, and the biggest dot is the most recent reading.

Notice that only one row crosses to the left of the line, and notice how far apart the three dots sit on some rows.

Israeli prices by category against the OECD average, 2022 to 2024
Price level index, OECD equals 100. Sorted by the 2024 reading. The bottom row is the OECD category "information and communication".
2022 2023 2024

Swipe the chart sideways to see every category.

Start at the top with meat, where the 2024 dot sits at 164, meaning meat costs 64 percent more in Israel than the OECD average. Run down to purchase of vehicles at 140. Then go to the bottom row, communications, the only row on the left of the line, at 89.7. Now look back at the spread within rows: vehicles read 152 in 2022 and 140 in 2024, and communications swung from 81 to 68 to 90 in three consecutive years.

That spread is a warning about a number in wide circulation. The widely quoted figures for Israel, food 52 percent above the OECD average and dairy 64 percent above, are the 2022 readings, and they reached the press through a broadcaster's summary rather than from the database. The dataset moves ten to twenty index points a year, largely because it is a ratio of purchasing power parities to exchange rates and the shekel moves. Any single year of it can be made to say almost anything.

Which is why the index is the supporting evidence here and the fourteen year price series is the main evidence. The one thing the ladder shows that survives every year and every revision is the bottom row. Communications is Israel's only category below the OECD average, in 2022, in 2023 and in 2024.

Four

If a family moves, which country turns out to be dearer?

Israel wins on tuition, America wins on groceries

The same database prices the United States on the same categories in the same year, which makes the comparison a family actually faces. In the chart below each category has two bars. The blue bar is Israel, the amber bar is the United States, and both are measured against the same OECD average of 100. The longer bar is the more expensive country.

Look for the two rows where the amber bar is dramatically longer.

Israel against the United States, by category, 2023
Price level index, OECD equals 100. Sorted by the size of the gap between the two.
Israel United States

Swipe the chart sideways to see the full bars.

Find education services near the top. The American bar reaches 202 against Israel's 106, so schooling costs roughly twice the OECD average in America and roughly the average in Israel. Below it, health reads 149 for the United States and 127 for Israel. Then find meat, where the bars reverse completely: Israel at 161, the United States at 97.2. Israel is dearer in eighteen of these twenty six categories, and America is dearer in eight.

For an Orthodox family the two rows at the top are not decoration. American education services price at double the OECD average, and day school tuition is the single largest line in the household budgets this series has been measuring. Israel's dearest categories are beef and dairy. America's dearest category is school.

Five

Why did food and cars not follow the phones?

Thirty six of thirty eight food categories are concentrated

The State Comptroller audited the Israeli food sector in November 2024 and counted the suppliers behind each of thirty eight product categories. The table below gives what the three largest suppliers control in the categories the audit names, alongside the summary counts.

Who supplies Israeli food
State Comptroller Report 75A, Part Two, November 2024.
MeasureShare
Creamheld by the three largest suppliers99%
Instant coffeeheld by the three largest suppliers93%
Breakfast cerealsheld by the three largest suppliers87%
Average across all 38 categoriesheld by the three largest suppliers84%
Private label, Israelshare of retail food and consumer goods sales, 20226.9%
Private label, selected European countriesthe same measure, for comparison36.1%
Highly concentrated categoriesof the 38 examined36
Categories above 85 percentheld by the three largest suppliers20
Read the top row first: in cream, three companies hold 99 percent of the market. Then compare the two shaded private label rows, 6.9 percent against 36.1 percent, a difference of more than five times. The audit deliberately does not examine kashrut (Jewish dietary law) certification, so nothing in this table should be read as a finding about it.

The import route is the other half. A food product entering Israel on the sensitive food track waits 74 to 111 days for approval. The same product on the European track clears in about five. The Comptroller measured a price gap of up to 380 percent on frozen vegetables against European countries, and 82 percent on whole wheat bread against the United States, the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Spain.

Israel did eventually act on this. In August 2024 the Knesset passed a reform titled mah shetov leEropa tov leYisrael (what is good for Europe is good for Israel), letting a product sold lawfully in Europe be sold in Israel without a second round of Israeli testing. The table below shows what it covers.

What the January 2025 standards reform covers, and what it leaves out
Passed August 2024. Energy provisions effective 1 November 2024, the rest 1 January 2025.
CategoryStatusDetail
General consumer goodsIncludedEuropean declaration of conformity replaces Israeli testing
Energy consuming appliancesIncludedEffective 1 November 2024
CosmeticsIncludedLicensing route closed 31 December 2024
FoodSeparate trackAbout 24 European regulations adopted, three year transition, extendable by two
Motor vehiclesExcludedNamed as an exclusion in the reform
Fire safety itemsExcludedPortable extinguishers and some smoke detectors exempted from the exclusion
Children's cosmetics, sun protection, nano ingredientsExcludedCarved out on safety grounds
The shaded row is the one to hold on to. Motor vehicles, the second most expensive category in the ladder chart, were left out of the reform by name.

The exclusion makes sense once you see what actually sets Israeli car prices. Standards were never the binding constraint. Purchase tax is, at a headline rate on petrol cars far above anything an American buyer faces, before value added tax, adjusted by an emissions credit. The tax on electric vehicles rose from 35 to 45 percent in January 2025, with the benefit ceiling cut from 50,000 to 35,000 shekels, and the Treasury proposed 52 percent for 2026, which the Knesset rejected, leaving the rate at 48 with a 22,000 shekel cap. A standards reform cannot touch a tax schedule, so vehicles stayed out of it.

The bottom line

Policy, and it is decided one market at a time

So: is Israel expensive because of geography, or because of policy? Because of policy, and the proof is that the one market Israel deregulated is the one market where it is cheap.

Geography is real, and the OECD lists it first among the causes of Israeli prices, along with strained regional relations and a shipping map with few short routes. Geography also cannot explain why the price of a phone line fell 45 percent in the same fourteen years that the price of everything else rose 20 percent, inside the same borders.

What this does to the rest of the series is change the tense. Every figure in these essays, the grocery basket, the car, the mortgage, is a description of a policy settlement that a Knesset could revise. Cellular service proves the revision can work, and it took roughly seven months from the first new carrier to a measurable fall.

The mirror is worth holding too, because the same argument runs the other way across the ocean. American mobile data is expensive, and the policy story behind it involves four national carriers becoming three in 2020. American sugar costs roughly twice the world price, which the Government Accountability Office attributes to a price guarantee and import quotas allocated on a formula built from forty year old data. American education services price at double the OECD average. Nobody argues America is expensive because it is small and isolated.

For a family weighing the move, the practical reading is narrow. You are not choosing between an expensive country and a cheap one. You are choosing which set of political decisions you would rather live inside, and Israel has shown at least once that it can change its mind.

חשבון · heshbon, a reckoning

What this measures, and what it cannot

The price level index moves with the exchange rate

A comparative price level is the ratio of a purchasing power parity to a market exchange rate, so a country's whole ladder shifts when its currency moves. The shekel averaged about 3.36 to the dollar in 2022 and about 3.70 in 2023 and 2024, which is a large part of why every Israeli category reads lower after 2022. That is exactly why the essay leads with the consumer price index, which compares a country only against its own past.

2023 and 2024 are preliminary

The OECD marks 2022 as quasi-final and 2023 and 2024 as preliminary, and a full revision of every analytical category for 2022 to 2025 is scheduled for December 2026. The classification also changed in 2025 to align with COICOP 2018, so category definitions are not identical to those used in earlier press coverage. The figures here should be re-pulled after the December 2026 revision.

The communications category is broader than mobile phones

COICOP category 08 covers postal services, telephone and telefax equipment, and telephone and telefax services together. Mobile service dominates the Israeli index, but the series is not a pure measure of cellular tariffs, and no publicly available monthly series is. The 20 to 26 shekel current plan figure comes from a consumer comparison guide rather than from carrier tariff filings.

The reform chronology rests partly on secondary accounts

The dates and the mechanisms are well documented, but the pre-reform price range of 150 to 250 shekels a month, the licence conditions, the 20 percent combined market share and the 13 percent investment rate come from a 2019 journalistic account of the reform rather than from a Ministry of Communications document.

Nobody has decomposed the food price gap

This essay shows that Israeli food is dear and that Israeli food supply is concentrated and hard to import into. It does not apportion the gap between concentration, import barriers, tariffs, kashrut certification and genuine scale, because no published study does. The Bank of Israel's food price work is a wartime rapid index with no cross country benchmark, and the OECD Economic Survey lists causes without weighting them.

One claim in circulation was left out

A widely repeated line holds that Israeli imports run 6.9 percent of GDP against an OECD average of 47 percent. The 6.9 percent figure appears in the Comptroller's report as the private label share, and Israel's actual imports of goods and services ran about 27.6 percent of GDP in 2023 against an OECD median near 31 percent. Two numbers appear to have been collided somewhere in the reporting chain, so the claim is not used here.

Sources: OECD, joint Eurostat-OECD Purchasing Power Parities Programme, price level indices by analytical category, dataflow OECD.SDD.TPS DSD_PPP@DF_PPP_CPL version 1.1, measure PL, base reference area OECD, retrieved 25 August 2026. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED), OECD consumer price index series ISRCP080000IXOBM, USACP080000IXOBM and ISRCPIALLMINMEI, COICOP 1999, index 2015 equals 100. State Comptroller of Israel, Report 75A Part Two, "The State's Response to Concentration and Monopolies in the Food Sector", November 2024, English abstract. OECD, Economic Surveys: Israel 2025, chapter on addressing the high cost of living, and OECD Ecoscope, "Why is life so expensive in Israel?", 2 April 2025. Herzog Law and the Israeli government's English briefing on the "what is good for Europe is good for Israel" import reform. Jerusalem Post on 2025 vehicle purchase tax rates and the Israel Tax Authority notice on 2026 electric vehicle rates. United States Government Accountability Office, GAO-24-106144, Sugar Program, 2024. Israel Democracy Institute, "The Cost of Living in Israel: What do the Numbers Say?", Flug, Porat Hirsch and Portal, 2022. Reform chronology from The Tyee, "If Canada Wants to Slash Cell Bills, Here's How One Nation Did It", 2019, and the corporate record of Golan Telecom. Ḥeshbon · Center on Data and Jewish Life, August 2026. A visual essay.

Ḥeshbon

A data project on how Jewish life is paid for, published in full. Every figure comes from the underlying research, and where a chart simplifies a published result the piece says so.

Each piece here is published, with its own sources, sample sizes and limits stated in place. Percentages describe the samples observed, and several rest on small denominators, noted where they appear. Nothing here audits an individual institution. Aliyah figures are current as of August 2026, at roughly three shekels to the dollar, and Israeli tax and benefit rules move faster than that.